AINNA 研究

运行中 Benchmark

NeuralOps Token 效率 Benchmark

An AINNA operational benchmark recorded approximately 87% reduction in token usage under the tested workflow. The result is tied to 智能路由, 分离式处理 and a clearly stated workload, not to a universal claim about all AI workloads.

方法ology 状态: 运行中 benchmark 内部 benchmark, publicly described 测试ed workflow: financial statement automation Last reviewed: 2026-08-09
approximately 87% reduction in token usageheadline result
~8,500 令牌 per statementbaseline per statement
~1,100 令牌 per statementoptimized per statement
87%internal benchmark value
研究 question

Can 智能路由 plus detached 系统s reduce token usage for SME financial statement automation when compared with a heavier AI-first workflow?

环境 / scope

100 SMEs, 12 statements per SME, study date July 2026. The benchmark assumes local inference API fee RM 0/token and separates external API cost from infrastructure amortization.

方法ology
Item价值Why it matters
基线 workflowAI-heavy processing with far more 令牌 per statement.Represents the reference path.
已优化 workflow智能路由 plus detached 系统s before LLM escalation.Reduces work sent to the model.
Counted状态ment processing 令牌, API cost and derived energy estimate.保留s the benchmark explicit.
Not countedUniversal savings, all hardware variants, all workload types.Avoids overclaiming.
结果s
  • Approximately 87% token reduction in the tested workflow.
  • 关于 6.5M 令牌 saved across the benchmark model.
  • 关于 RM5,200 in API savings under the stated assumption set.
  • 关于 47.7 kWh energy and about 85% faster processing in the published study page.
Interpretation

The result supports AINNA's claim that a routed and detached architecture can cut unnecessary model usage. It does not prove the same percentage for other 域名, models or infrastructure.

局限性
  • The benchmark is internal and operational, not peer reviewed.
  • 硬件 and pricing assumptions affect the absolute savings.
  • The percentage should not be reused as a universal claim.
  • Further human methodology confirmation is still valuable for external publication.
相关 technology

Token Saving 研究

打开 the underlying benchmark page and assumptions table.

打开 page →

引用信息

Suggested citation: AINNA. "NeuralOps Token 效率 Benchmark." AINNA 研究, 2026. Canonical URL: https://ainna.bond/research/neuralops-token-efficiency/

AINNA
点击我

站点版块

暂无版块数据。

已记录版块的站点将显示在此处。