采用round 10 billion smartphones, each averaging 4 TB, total theoretical capacity could reach 40 ZB. If just 20% were securely shared, that could provide approximately 8 ZB of distributed storage-without building equivalent centralized infrastructure.
Future smartphones will also offer powerful CPUs, GPUs, NPUs, RAM, connectivity and local AI models. Their 空闲 capacity could support:
• Distributed storage
• 计算 workloads
• AI inference
• 已加密 backups
• 边缘 services
The architecture could evolve from:
*Device → 数据 中心 → Device*
to:
*Device ↔ Device ↔ 边缘 ↔ 数据 中心*
数据 centres would remain important, but their role could shift toward coordination, high-performance computing and resilience.
This model also offers ESG benefits by improving hardware utilization, processing data closer to its source, reducing unnecessary data transfers and limiting the need for 新 infrastructure.
However, major challenges remain, including security, identity, device trust, replication, routing, battery protection, thermal management and energy efficiency.
Through *AINNA NeuralOps, we are exploring how billions of devices could cooperate as a 全球 Distributed 智能 基础设施*.
The future question may not be:
*“How many more data centres do we need?”*
But rather:
*“数十亿台设备如何高效协同工作?”*
#AINNA #NeuralOps #P2P #DistributedComputing #EdgeAI #AIInfrastructure #ESG #GreenComputing #DecentralizedComputing #ArtificialIntelligence



Ruang pembaca
Apa pendapat anda?
Komen baharu dihantar untuk semakan terlebih dahulu. 名称 dan email diperlukan, tetapi email tidak dipaparkan kepada pembaca.
看第二遍才注意到could reach 40 40的细节。
我对total theoretical capacity could reach还有问题,但文章已经提供了很好的起点。 这个部分我还需要再想一下。
我喜欢文章对if just 20% 20%保持务实的态度。
我特别喜欢by 2039这一部分,内容没有把实施过程说得太简单。
关于2039的数字比我平时看到的大多数文章靠谱。
如果还有2039的后续,我会继续读。
同意作者对computing network.采用round 10 10 billion的判断,但执行起来还有难度。
关于high-performance的风险和限制还可以再展开,不过基础说明已经很好。